Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Four States: Implementation and Early Impacts

Policy Points Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Vermont leveraged State Innovation Model awards to implement Medicaid accountable care organizations (ACOs). Flexibility in model design, ability to build on existing reforms, provision of technical assistance to providers, and access to feedback data all facilitated ACO development. Challenges included sustainability of transformation efforts and the integration of health care and social service providers. Early estimates showed promising improvements in hospital-related utilization and Vermont was able to reduce or slow the growth of Medicaid costs. These states are sustaining Medicaid ACOs owing in part to provider support and early successes in generating shared savings. The states are modifying their ACOs to include greater accountability and financial risk.

Context: As state Medicaid programs consider alternative payment models (APMs), many are choosing accountable care organizations (ACOs) as a way to improve health outcomes, coordinate care, and reduce expenditures. Four states (Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Vermont) leveraged State Innovation Model awards to create or expand Medicaid ACOs.

Methods: We used a mixed-methods design to assess achievements and challenges with ACO implementation and the impact of Medicaid ACOs on health care utilization, quality, and expenditures in three states. We integrated findings from key informant interviews, focus groups, document review, and difference-in-difference analyses using data from Medicaid claims and an all-payer claims database.

Findings: States built their Medicaid ACOs on existing health care reforms and infrastructure. Facilitators of implementation included allowing flexibility in design and implementation, targeting technical assistance, and making clinical, cost, and use data readily available to providers. Barriers included provider concerns about their ability to influence patient behavior, sustainability of provider practice transformation efforts when shared savings are reinvested into the health system and not shared with participating clinicians, and limited integration between health care and social service providers. Medicaid ACOs were associated with some improvements in use, quality, and expenditures, including statistically significant reductions in emergency department visits. Only Vermont's ACO demonstrated slower growth in total Medicaid expenditures.

Conclusions: Four states demonstrated that adoption of ACOs for Medicaid beneficiaries was both possible and, for three states, associated with some improvements in care. States revised these models over time to address stakeholder concerns, increase provider participation, and enable some providers to accept financial risk for Medicaid patients. Lessons learned from these early efforts can inform the design and implementation of APMs in other Medicaid programs.

Keywords: Medicaid; accountable care organizations; alternative payment models; state innovation models.

Cited by

Constantin J, Wehby GL. Constantin J, et al. Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14370. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14370. Epub 2024 Aug 8. Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39118199 Free PMC article.

Wang Q, Dai R, Yu Q, Zhang T, Wu B. Wang Q, et al. Front Public Health. 2024 May 6;12:1372821. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1372821. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38770361 Free PMC article.

Dyer Z, Alcusky M, Himmelstein J, Ash A, Kerrissey M. Dyer Z, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 20;12(2):266. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020266. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38275548 Free PMC article.

Sabatino MJ, Mick EO, Ash AS, Himmelstein J, Alcusky MJ. Sabatino MJ, et al. Popul Health Manag. 2023 Oct 30;26(6):420-9. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0151. Online ahead of print. Popul Health Manag. 2023. PMID: 37903233

van Ede AFTM, Minderhout RN, Stein KV, Bruijnzeels MA. van Ede AFTM, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):910. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09915-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37626327 Free PMC article. Review.

References

1. Rudowitz R, Valentine A. Medicaid enrollment & spending growth: FY 2017 & 2018. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; October 19, 2017. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-enrollment-spending-gr. . Accessed October 12, 2018.
1. Wiener JM, Romaire M, Thach N, et al. Strategies to reduce Medicaid spending: findings from a literature review. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; June 21, 2017. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/strategies-to-reduce-medicaid-s. . Accessed October 12, 2018.
1. Muhlestein D. Growth and dispersion of accountable care organizations in 2015. Health Affairs blog. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20150331.045829/full/. Published March 31, 2015. Accessed October 12, 2018. - DOI
1. McWilliams JM, Hatfield LA, Chernew ME, Landon BE, Schwartz AL. Early performance of accountable care organizations in Medicare. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(24):2357‐2366. 10.1056/NEJMsa1600142 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. McWilliams JM, Landon BE, Chernew ME. Performance in year 1 of Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(8):777 10.1056/NEJMc1507320 - DOI - PubMed

Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Four States: Implementation and Early Impacts

Similar articles

Cited by

References